12 July 2005

Mr Wang Is So Creative

Jeremy Chen of Convex Square wrote this on his blog:
    "I applaud the British for their show of strength. Just days after lunatics, bent on murder, set off bombs in London, the British have already pulled themselves together and are back to work. Do not give those lunatics the pleasure of watching you writhe in fear. London, Britain, I applaud you."
Actually, this post leads me to think that maybe the Singapore government should encourage employers to actively institute and offer alternative working arrangements for their employees. Under these arrangements, people would work much less at the office, and much more at home.

With modern technology, many employees don't really need to be in the office to do their jobs. Nowadays, we have the telephone, email, fax etc. With a few pokes at your telephone buttons, you can fix up a conference call with several people at the same time. With a little thumbdrive or a CD-ROM, you can easily carry huge amounts of electronic data back and forth between home and office.

Exactly what kind of alternative working arrangements should be introduced? That depends on the job and the company. For some, it could mean, say, coming to work only on Tuesdays and Thursdays, and working from home on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. For others, it could mean coming to work on a need basis, that is, the default is that you work from home, and you would come to office only if you needed to, say, physically attend a meeting. For yet other employees in yet other jobs, it could mean spending the morning in the office, and then spending the afternoon at home, or vice versa.

There are several advantages. If employers in Singapore really, seriously implemented these sorts of arrangements, then in the event of a terrorist attack, there would be a lot less disruption to the affected companies. This is because a large number of staff would be quite able to continue running a wide range of business operations from their home (because that's what they'd have been doing all along).

Secondly, a large number of people working from home at any one time also means that there will be a large drop in the number of commuters using public transport during the traditional peak hours. This drop makes it easier for authorities to monitor public areas such as MRT stations for security threats. Fewer people would be hurt during a terrorist attack, say, on the public transport system.

Of course, there are other assorted corollary advantages - the most obvious one being that the Singapore working lifestyle would become more family-friendly. Working parents would be able to spend more time with their kids at home. If implemented in a big way, these alternative working arrangements could even enable companies to save on rent for office space. You wouldn't need to lease so much space if only 50% of your staff are actually going to be in the office on any particular working day.

To effect all these changes, there needs to be a big change in mindset. But I feel that it's worth looking into. Apart from the fact that many jobs really don't need to be done in the office, one must consider the idea that terrorism is a long-term threat. It will be here for the next 5, 10, 15 years. It's worth the hassle of making all these changes to the working world.

See? Mr Wang told you it was possible.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dream on.

Mr Wang Says So said...

Oh, stranger things have happened.

In the banking industry at least, the authorities require all banks in Singapore to draw up "business continuity plans", which basically means a plan on how they are going to continue operations in the event of some catastrophic event such as a terrorist attack,

Many banks' BCPs for at least some of their departments is simply for their staff to work from home.

My idea is just a grand extension of that idea.

vandice said...

Hey Mr. Wang, his blog is called convex set lah, not convex square. Actually, I don't think this will work for many professions other than for the self-employed. Cos ppl need to feel like they're in a workplace before getting down to work. It adds structure to life. Also, office camaderie and working relationships cannot be developed via email, IM and phone calls alone. Staying at home is only going to reduce productivity and morale for most workers. Just more opportunity to skive, cos boss is not watching, for those salary men among us.

Mr Wang Says So said...

My other grand plan is to abolish the National Day Parade. Apart from being a highly attractive target for terrorists, it is also a phenomenal waste of time & money.

Anonymous said...

Symbolism and mindless ritual have always been the framework of society.

With neither symbolism or mindless ritual to give some semblance to social pecking order, society will disintegrate into anarchy.

Cheers,
Corporate Manwhore

Mr Wang Says So said...

Are you talking about the NDP idea or the flexi working hours idea?

If the former, we could always replace the NDP with smaller rituals. Like in schools and community centres. Decentralise everything so that terrorists don't have such obvious & easy targets.

Heavenly Sword said...

'Working from home' might not be a bad idea for some organizations....They can save on the rentals too...

elyrie said...

Working from home is getting increasingly common in the United States. Of course you have to show results and your employer has to trust you not to slack, but I think there are studies showing that it does lead to higher productivity!

The NDP is a way to coalesce national pride into a big show. We do have small everyday symbols everyday ie the saying of the pledge in schools but nothing quite as exciting as fireworks and fighter planes, hmm?

schwa.al said...

they should make saying the pledge more exciting...

Or at least teach the kids to mena exactly what their saying. lol